Timeline for Is "not constructive" really applicable at workplace.SE?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2012 at 3:38 | comment | added | yannis | One thing that bugs me with NC is that it's oftenly misused instead of NARQ, which better applies to overly broad and/or vague questions. Quickly glanced through our closed questions and I think there are a few that should have been closed as NARQ instead of NC. | |
| Apr 30, 2012 at 13:16 | comment | added | Rachel | I agree that this close reason needs to be kept around though for things like polls and truly not-constructive questions. | |
| Apr 30, 2012 at 13:15 | comment | added | Rachel |
That quote references answers, not questions. Questions do not have to involve "facts, references, or specific expertise", providing it is clear what is being asked, and the question is on-topic for the site.
|
|
| Apr 27, 2012 at 14:55 | history | answered | Zelda | CC BY-SA 3.0 |