This thread was closed as asking for legal advice:
How can I minimize the risks of moonlighting in violation of my contract?
This does not seem to fall under the guidelines discussed in the linked meta thread:
Other questions which I consider OK are ones where the answer would be "You need to read your contact" or "You need to consult with a lawyer".
...
For instance, if someone asks, "Is it legal to turn a blind eye to fraud by a superior?" it is going to be a legal question, but asking, "What are my responsibilities in regards to reporting fraud by a superior?" the legal side would only be one aspect, and the answer would have value since it would say more than just, "Consult a lawyer."
I would appreciate re-open votes (I have already issued mine), and while I understand it is easy to click 'close', I would urge people to take time to make sure the question is really off-topic (it can't be answered within site guidelines as addressed in the help center and on this meta), and that it can't be saved by an edit and turned in to a productive question.
Prior to my edit the question had already collected 1 close vote from jcmeloni I believe.
Asking what the law says about violating a contract is asking for legal advice.
I think it's the opposite, actually. The purpose of an attorney is in interpretation and application of the law. Sohow to limit consequences
is exactly the realm of needing legal advice. – Nicole Sep 4 '13 at 0:58"I have a product that has the potential to harm users. How can I minimize my chances of being sued?"
actually I'm afraid I'd consider that off-topic by the same standards. I'm not saying it's a great situation; I would love it if we could answer these questions. But I just don't think we can do so adequately. It's too dangerous. – Nicole Sep 4 '13 at 0:59