1

Eg This answer: https://workplace.stackexchange.com/a/23683/17187

I've seen it a few times, the term 'recruiter' being used to refer to the hiring manager at the employing firm.

My understanding is that a recruiter is someone who works independently of the employer, acting as a middleman to find talent for the employer to interview.

Is my understanding correct, if so, and what term should be used here instead?

10

There are two kinds of recruiters (at least in my experience in the US). Third-party recruiters are (or work for) independent agents that have both companies and job-seekers as clients; they win when they match these up, and they work on commission. This is the more common use of the term.

But some companies also have in-house recruiters, people who work for that company and have, as a primary job function, finding and filtering candidates for open positions. They may be salaried employees. My last employer had such a person, and Google has several (judging from my LinkedIn mail); those are but two data points. So it's not correct to say that a recruiter always works independently of the employer.

All that said, the recruiter is definitely different from the hiring manager. This case sounds like a mistake. Feel free to offer an edit to the post to correct the reference.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .