I don't understand all of the close votes on my question here.
In my opinion my question is clear and is not
- A legal question
- Too specific (unless the community considers the entire country of Australia to be "too specific.")
Please justify these close votes.
If people are confused or didn't read the key question, in bold, or voted to close after briefly skimming the question, then they shouldn't be voting to close!
I implore people to vote to reopen, since it meets none of the vote to close reasons.