4

https://workplace.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/42296

This edit just got rejected. The 'Community' user cited a strange reason, which I think doesn't apply:

This edit did not correct critical issues with the post - view the revision history to see what should have been changed

The user who rejected and edited just changed all 'Time Sheet's to 'timesheet's.

I don't understand what's happening here. My edit was more substantial than that.

||||||
  • I've resubmitted the edit - feel free to review: workplace.stackexchange.com/review/suggested-edits/42297 – cst1992 May 4 '16 at 9:55
  • The latter edit has since been approved. – cst1992 May 4 '16 at 10:34
  • I also don't know what it means that Community, rather than a user or group of users, reviewed an edit. I think I've had that question before (somewhere on the network) but I don't remember the answer. :-( – Monica Cellio May 4 '16 at 13:01
  • 2
    @MonicaCellio it means that a (human) reviewer has picked an option "Reject and Edit", see Why does the Community ♦ user approve and reject edits? FWIW as a moderator you can suspend users from reviewing edits for a while if you feel like their approach needs correction – gnat May 4 '16 at 13:40
  • @gnat OK, so it was because the other guy picked 'Reject and Edit'? Makes sense - the community user marks it as rejected, and at the same time the other user can edit the post. Thanks for the info. – cst1992 May 4 '16 at 13:44
  • 3
    @gnat thanks. So there were really only two reviewers, but Community did the bidding of one of them, generating a separate entry. Yeah, that's confusing -- the "(user) Reject and Edit" entry should be enough. – Monica Cellio May 4 '16 at 14:26

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .