Can we help users determine what is a rude response? Often times I find myself flagging a user, thinking "I am glad I helped get this rude person off the site". I am given no feedback, so what am I to think? I think that, yes that person was rude, or the moderators would have told me it was a bad flag, right?

I guess there is no system in place for flag-feedback (for comments), and I am wondering if it would help users to actually know if their flags are accurate or not.

  • Just FYI, I deleted my answer because after your edit, my answer is only tangentially applicable and either way, Monica's is far better.
    – enderland
    Commented Jan 5, 2017 at 3:00
  • I have also deleted my answer, your edit made it irrelevant, and Monica's is far better. Commented Jan 5, 2017 at 13:20
  • @Prodnegel MUCH better question after the edit, good work! Commented Jan 5, 2017 at 19:45
  • @RichardU Thanks friend, I apologize again to you and others who I offended with my first rant. I need to learn to be more patient with these things
    – Prodnegel
    Commented Jan 5, 2017 at 20:08
  • 2
    @Prodnegel No worries. I know I can come across as harsh at times. Monica's advice below is SPOT ON. SE is fairly unique in it's moderation in that they do things very quietly, so it can appear that you're being ignored, but they do look at everything, and are open to input and feedback. Commented Jan 5, 2017 at 20:14
  • We generally don't delete things on meta unless they're clearly problematic, but I just deleted a bunch of comments here because they were mostly obsolete after the edit and because they showed some frustration that I think has now been cleared up. If any participant wants me to preserve them anyway, let me know and I'll send 'em to a chat room. I think we all want to move on, which is why I didn't do that to start. Commented Jan 8, 2017 at 22:47
  • Possible duplicate of What is rude on The Workplace?
    – Masked Man
    Commented Jan 9, 2017 at 4:46
  • "I guess there is no system in place for flag-feedback" How's that? There is feedback for both parties. Get enough flags and the mods will talk to you about your behaviour or put you in the time-out corner. And declined flags are also visible, if annoyingly well-hidden. Even then you'll be warned of recent declined flags the next time you flag.
    – Lilienthal Mod
    Commented Jan 9, 2017 at 8:30

1 Answer 1


I have seen an increase in rudeness on this site over the last year. I have also seen an increase in short-fuse reactions to rudeness -- things that would have just been flagged and otherwise ignored in the past are more likely to garner responses, which garner responses, which turn into prolonged arguments with declining civility, sometimes with established sparring partners. And I think, though I'm not sure, that I'm seeing more claims of rudeness where I'm having trouble seeing what's rude about that.

(You want to know why we nuke comments more than some of y'all would like? Because when we see that sort of thing developing, we know how it ends and we really don't need to see it for the 50th or 100th or 1000th time. I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of times, in 4.5 years, one of those comment death-spirals has ended with "gosh, you're right; I'm sorry and I'll fix that".)

We have more rudeness and also more willingness to be offended than we used to have. We need to do better, on both. It's draining on the community and, quite frankly, it's draining on the mods, most of whom have quietly taken extended vacations from the site at some point.

Moderators delete a lot of rude and non-constructive comments, almost always in response to flags. (It's a big site; ain't nobody got time to find and review every single comment or even, sometimes, every single post.) We have recently gotten some better tools that help us get a handle on patterns at the individual-user level, but broader patterns are harder to spot.

We've suspended users for rudeness. I anticipate that we will need to suspend more. It can be hard to judge when the threshold has been crossed, and perhaps we err too much on the side of leniency. A lot of the rudeness I see is borderline at the level of the individual comment, but it can be like Chinese water torture -- aggregate effects matter too.

So, some advice for everybody:

  • Reread your words before you post. Especially if you're writing about something sensitive or you're already worked up, try really hard to read your words from the perspective of someone who disagrees with you. Even if you think that guy is an idiot. Especially if you think that guy is an idiot.

  • Give the benefit of the doubt when reading stuff from other people. Especially people you disagree with. And remember that disagreement or constructive criticism is not automatically rude.

  • Watch out for accusatory language. Understand the difference between "you need to back that up" and "could you edit in some sources?" and between "that's nonsense" and "I don't understand". Understand that words like "troll(ing)" pretty much always make things worse, and name-calling is a violation of the Be Nice policy.

  • If somebody seems to be upset with you, take that at face value. That doesn't mean he's right to be upset with you, but it does mean that the two of you are already at reduced ability to communicate constructively.

  • If that happens to you a lot, work even harder on the other points in this list.

  • De-escalate. If somebody responds to you in a hostile-seeming way, don't make it worse. If that means walking away, walk away. Neither of you has a "right" to the last word. If you think you can get things back on track without raising the heat level (and want to), try that.

  • Your cultural background, mental state, or concern about certain issues is not an excuse to behave badly. Be less ready to make excuses and more ready to make amends.

  • Flag.

  • Read your flag responses! We can't respond to flags on comments, but we can and do respond to flags on posts. If you have a question about a flag response, ask. (If a comment flag is declined but the comment is gone, then we might have goofed (it happens) or we might be telling you that a "rude" flag was overkill but, nonetheless, it should go.)

  • 1
    Brilliant. Not just because you partially agreed with my observation of rudeness, but because you looked at it with an unbiased opinion, while being a moderator yourself. Your advice on checking your answer before you submit "Especially if you think that guy is an idiot." is precisely where I feel the problem lies. I really do feel that the rudeness stems from a difference of opinions, cultures, and experiences. Because there are so many differences between us, the "this idiot again" mindset sinks in. After answering many legitimate questions, users may feel frustrated that they have to deal..
    – Prodnegel
    Commented Jan 4, 2017 at 22:25
  • 2
    ...with another user that they feel is "an idiot". Many times this annoyance comes away in the tone of the overall answer. If you are answering a question to a person you really do feel is an idiot, there is a far greater chance that you accidentally slip in a rude remark. Thank you Monica for understanding, I really do not mean to rant. Truly love this site and its questions, would love to see it prosper.
    – Prodnegel
    Commented Jan 4, 2017 at 22:28
  • Also, is there any way to see what we can do on the response to flagged comments?
    – Prodnegel
    Commented Jan 4, 2017 at 22:29
  • Thanks. On responses to flagged comments, best bet is probably a feature request explaining the problem and making a proposal. You can make feature requests on per-site metas or on Meta Stack Exchange; they'll get more attention (in both directions :-) ) on main meta, and take longer to get SE attention on per-site metas. Commented Jan 4, 2017 at 22:38

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .