The question has been marked as an exact duplicate of another. The current question talks about the effects of acquisition of the OP's team by another company, while the supposed question that it is a duplicate of talks about the effects of acquisition of the entire company where that OP was employed.
When making a resume, both are very different situations that need to be portrayed and therefore, I feel that the question isn't a duplicate.
Here's the question being talked about: How do I represent a buy out of my team on my resume?
Here's the reportedly 'exact duplicate' What is the accepted method of indicating a company being acquired on a resume?
Furthermore, the highest-voted answer for that question says that the current company was formerly known as something else. This answer doesn't make sense to be written on a resume of the first OP because only their team was acquired; the former company still exists!
I am requesting that this question be reopened.