Two questions were recently asked, each looking for the opposing view of the other. The original question is currently open, while the second has been put on hold for being "too broad".
The original, asks why somebody working for a sole employer for 15 years is not a "red-flag" in recruitment:
Soon after, a second question asks the opposing side of the question - why somebody working for a sole employer for 15 years is a "red-flag" in recruitment. This has now been put on hold for being "too broad":
There is not a particularly huge amount of information in the first question that seems to make it more specific (other than potentially that they have added that the interviewee is a software-engineer).
I am currently not clear of the ways the second question fails to meet the on-topic criteria, where the first does.
In what ways is the second question "more broad" than the first (to the point it needs closed) - and what additional information would be required in this kind of situation?