Based on the meta question on the interpretation the criteria to qualify a question as "company specific" brought up here, I noticed that there is confusion on what is the reason for closing a question - company-specific policies or legal advice.
My perception is mainly because the meta question uses this question as an example of an unclear interpretation of "company specific" but the reason it attracted so many VTC - also explained in the comments to the question - is that the question is seeking legal advice.
The question very clearly doesn't relate to company-specific policies and regulations that would require somebody working for the same company to have enough context to give an useful answer.
I brought up the potential solution of separating the two reasons to close as separate items, a recommendation was made to ask a separate question, so here I am.
Is it possible to have separate items in Reasons To Close for Legal Advice and Company-Specific?