Timeline for 1 rep user, first post is controversial
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2018 at 17:15 | history | edited | DarkCygnusMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Jun 7, 2018 at 17:14 | comment | added | Old_Lamplighter | @DavidK The most obvious cases are just that, and there are clear indicators, as outlined above. Poor English, is one thing, a new user, is one thing, neglecting feedback is one thing. Combined, it's a clear example. So, I guess what determines what is serious is the number of red flags. This one has more than the Chinese government had on display during the olympics | |
| Jun 7, 2018 at 17:14 | history | edited | DarkCygnusMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
typo
|
| Jun 7, 2018 at 16:18 | comment | added | David K | @Crossedtheriverstyx Yes, but how do you determine what is and isn't serious? I think it's likely the OP of this question is being completely serious - they just have a poor grasp of English and are not clearly communicating their problem. | |
| Jun 7, 2018 at 13:10 | comment | added | Old_Lamplighter | @DavidK yeah, but if the question isn't serious, it should be deleted, as opposed to just closed. | |
| Jun 7, 2018 at 12:31 | comment | added | David K | +1 The rule around here is that it doesn't matter if you suspect trolling, treat the question based on its content (or lack thereof in this case). | |
| Jun 6, 2018 at 20:52 | history | answered | DarkCygnusMod | CC BY-SA 4.0 |