Timeline for The Question-Close Police
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2018 at 3:15 | comment | added | Monica Cellio Mod | @Kilisi mods have deleted that comment three times now. Remember to remain constructive. | |
| Aug 10, 2018 at 15:16 | history | edited | Jim G. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Corrected spelling
|
| Aug 6, 2018 at 11:49 | comment | added | Neo | I am not clear as to why this is getting down-voted so hard.... | |
| Jul 30, 2018 at 15:55 | comment | added | user1602 | @Lilienthal Acknowledged. I will refrain from this in the future. | |
| Jul 30, 2018 at 15:42 | comment | added | Lilienthal Mod | @Kyralessa While the wording in your question is a bit strong and perhaps needlessly dismissive, I don't think that constitutes an attack like IDIKT is saying here. But what is over the line is calling out specific users because you seem to think they shouldn't be allowed to use the privileges granted to them. Please refrain from using this or any space on the network to single people out in this manner. | |
| Jul 30, 2018 at 14:47 | comment | added | IDrinkandIKnowThings | @Kyralessa - You used the term close police... That is quite rude for those of us trying to keep a certian standards not having bad questions for discussion. | |
| Jul 30, 2018 at 14:43 | comment | added | user1602 | I believe I did in fact argue the merits of each question in my text above. I can't know the mind of the closers. I have to guess based on the nebulous close-reason text given. Closers (for some reason) don't have to give any specifics beyond the close reason itself. I'm aware of the principle of reputation threshold; I have a little more than 878 rep on StackOverflow. | |
| Jul 30, 2018 at 14:30 | history | answered | IDrinkandIKnowThings | CC BY-SA 4.0 |